Faxed Contracts Don’t Hold Up in Court
Fact or Fiction?
Fact or Fiction?
Zeldman has a great argument for why you should never design on-spec. Basically, he sums it up in one sentence: Design is only partly decoration. Mainly it is problem solving. Unless the RFP spells out site goals and user needs in phenomenal detail, you can?t create an appropriate design because you don?t yet know what…
It’s obvious that some companies should have set office hours. Any time you have frequent foot traffic at a business, it just makes sense. But what about at service companies, or small businesses where only a handful of employees work? At our company, we don’t have a set rule, but just a suggestion that you…
This article talks about how multi-tasking really isn’t productive. It’s something I’ve felt for a long time. Whenever I’m inundated with, say, 10 tasks I become overwhelmed and try to work on each of them. Some days I just say “today I’m going to just work on this project and nothing else.” I tend to…
I really liked the post over at Signal vs. Noise about CD Baby copywriting. Be sure to read the comments. Gotta love a company that doesn’t mind being fun. Reference: CDbaby.com
I remember years ago when every project wasn’t a “rush” project. Those were the days.
Steve Pavlina has a good article up on his site about making $10,000 an hour. The concept isn’t to make $10,000 every hour, but to be aware of the ideas around you that might earn $10,000 over the course of the next year. He talks about how you have to think beyond the normal “I…
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
I am going to say absolutely. If the gov’t can accept a faxed document for taxes then it should be able to hold up in court. Its only moderatly easier than forging someones signature.
Try this exercise:
1. Have someone sign their name on a piece of paper (Maybe by having them sign some general, unrelated, innocent contract?).
2. Cut out their signature.
3. Prepare elaborate legal document saying said person owes you $5,000.
4. Glue their signature onto the signature line.
5. Fax document to yourself.
6. Shred fake contract (the one with the glued-on signature).
If there are any visible cut-out outlines around the signature area, you could just use white-out on it and fax the result to yourself again.
Alternatively, you could just scan their signature into your computer, photoshop it onto your contract, print it, and fax it to yourself.
Ta-da! You have exactly the same document as you would if someone had actually signed the contract and faxed it to you for real.
Who knows? Maybe it would hold up in court somehow.
Personally, I would definitely feel more confident if I had a real piece of paper with real ink on it from someone’s pen as opposed to a fax. From what I’ve heard, a handwriting analyst would be able to look at the genuine ink signature under a microscope and see the trademark characteristics that identify it as a real signature, such as the speed and direction of the ink flow as it’s whipped across the paper. With a fax, it’s simply my word against my opponents. And if he’s going to be on the losing end of the deal, I somehow doubt he’ll be willing to produce the original document with his signature on it.
“Just the fax, and nothing but the fax.”
Fiction, I bought my first house without even seeing it. Faxed all the paper work to our realtor.
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4181/is_20050413/ai_n13613150
I work at a university. We do not except faxed copies of transcripts or faxed copies of the signed degree plans. Only original will do. We are talking peoples lives here. Degrees are contracts between the university and the student. We hold up our end of the bargin and the student does their part, as well. So, I would believe “faxed contracts do not hold up in court” I’m also a notary. Faxing a contract is a temporary solution, (hold the deal), till the real thing is posted.
Well… this is good news for the postal service.
From the real estate industry perspective, I have two perspectives:
1) As Mark stated, it is abundantly common to have purchase contracts that have been faxed many times. Precedence has definitely held up these contracts as valid.
2) If the government is involved, original documents are usually required. This includes the documents that the title company submits for local recording. It also includes the paperwork necessary for a HUD purchase.
I fax contracts of loan documents all the time. The lender seems OK with just the fax…maybe they shouldn’t be.