Comments on: Web 2.0 Logo

By: Animals having sex with girls.

Animals having sex with girls. — Mon, 19 May 2008 02:51:17 +0000

Sex with animals….

Animals sex. Sex animals. Animals having sex. Girl having sex with animals. Men having sex with animals. Sex with animals….

By: | applicationweb.info

| applicationweb.info — Sun, 18 Mar 2007 06:16:28 +0000

[...] BrainFuel ” Web 2.0 Logo … mold, or if we should find some careful balance between traditional and Web 2.0. … Our web application is what people will describe as Web 2.0. … [...]

By: | applicationweb.info

| applicationweb.info — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 03:01:11 +0000

[...] BrainFuel ” Web 2.0 Logo Web 2.0 Logo. Our web application is what people will describe as Web 2.0. … mold, or if we should find some careful balance between traditional and Web 2.0. … [...]

By: Douglas Perkins

Douglas Perkins — Fri, 06 Oct 2006 21:01:45 +0000

I agree. Good design solves a communication problem whether it is “web 2.0″ or not. Go with what feels right. The web 2.0 style didn’t come about because no one cared for it – obviously it’s been popular. Perhaps this is your chance to show the world what happens when a designer takes the web 2.0 style to the next level. Break new ground, grasshopper.

By: J Phill

J Phill — Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:53:00 +0000

I would just go with your gut feeling and not worry about whether it is “web 2.0″ or not. Just do what looks good and helps represent your business/application.

Logopond has some great logos, I’ve been spending some time there getting ideas for a logo for a company I’m trying to start.

By: mark

mark — Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:25:01 +0000

That Limelight Group logo is very cool. Cheers to it.

By: CK

CK — Fri, 06 Oct 2006 08:22:53 +0000

Unfortunately, i’m one of those that loves the Web 2.0 style – gradients, primary colours, the works. I think it’s neat. The only issue is that it’s becoming rather common.

A half-way point of sorts would be very good. This way you remain different, yet in vogue. If that makes sense?