Intel 2006

7 Comments By Chris Tingom on January 3, 2006

intel_site.jpg

What do you think of the new Intel site?

7 Comments »

  • Comment posted by Stephan
    Rating: not yet rated
      
  • Would be a lot better if it was an actual leap year :rolleyes:

The previous Comment was posted on January 3, 2006 at 6:37 pm

  • Comment posted by Chris
    Rating: not yet rated
      
  • I’m all for it. I was always surprised at how ugly their website was for a large company. Bonus points for being HTML/CSS.

The previous Comment was posted on January 3, 2006 at 7:13 pm

  • Comment posted by Chris Tingom
    Rating: not yet rated
      
  • Stephan: That’s a really good point. Interesting.

The previous Comment was posted on January 3, 2006 at 7:23 pm

  • Comment posted by Danny Foo
    Rating: not yet rated
      
  • The homepage gives me a feeling that Intel doesn’t seem to be very interested in boosting their new logo. It’s rather tiny to me.

The previous Comment was posted on January 3, 2006 at 7:57 pm

  • Comment posted by mister jason
    Rating: not yet rated
      
  • I was surprised and impressed when I saw the redesign. Not too edgy, but really nice. I have to disagree with Danny to some degree, though. Yeah, the logo is pretty scaled down. But, everything else there strikes me as something like “hey! did you see that we’ve re-branded?! *smack* hey! see? see? did you notice?! look! new type treatments! *smack smack smack*”

    Or something. :)

    I’m like a broken record on the logo design, but the site redesign is a big winner in my book.

The previous Comment was posted on January 3, 2006 at 11:05 pm

  • Comment posted by Beth
    Rating: not yet rated
      
  • I think it’s nice but I hate that type for “It’s a Leap Year” bleh.

The previous Comment was posted on January 4, 2006 at 11:17 am

  • Comment posted by Jessica
    Rating: not yet rated
      
  • Improvement from old one. I like the color choice oodles more.

    I agree with Beth. I’m not keen on the type used on “It’s a Leap Year.”

The previous Comment was posted on January 6, 2006 at 11:53 am

RSS comment feed
TrackBack URI

Leave a comment