Baskin Robbins

Posted by Chris Tingom on June 26, 2006 at 10:33 pm.

Before:

After:

30 Comments ( RSS comment feed  |  TrackBack URI ) »

  • Comment posted by Josh Pigford on June 26, 2006 at 11:30 pm
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • I like the updated typeface but I don’t like how the middle 1/R is right before the “r” in “robbins”…so it’s like there are 2 R’s next to each other.

  • Comment posted by DT on June 27, 2006 at 1:47 am
    Rating: +0 votes
      
  • I think the BR + 31 embed is a great idea. But I feel it should be on its own as a logo not nested within the word.

  • Comment posted by Dat Nguyen on June 27, 2006 at 1:54 am
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • I can see why they chose the new logotype, but man, the BR in the middle just doesn’t flow. It hurts my head to try and read it.

    Yay for the fun type that isn’t rounded and three dimensional though.

  • Comment posted by Anthony on June 27, 2006 at 4:17 am
    Rating: +0 votes
      
  • That new logo is just fugly looking.

  • Comment posted by Andy Rutledge on June 27, 2006 at 5:20 am
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • Horrible logo. It violates the primary function of logos – to be simply memorable. This is one you have to “figure out.” Suicice for a logo.

  • Comment posted by Gordon on June 27, 2006 at 5:27 am
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • 31 is clever. The rest of it is clumsy. It’s almost like they’ve deliberately tried to go as far from the old logo as possible, where I think a more subtle re-working would’ve been more beneficial.

  • Comment posted by evan on June 27, 2006 at 5:42 am
    Rating: +0 votes
      
  • what is “Baskin Brrobbins?” ;)

  • Comment posted by beth on June 27, 2006 at 5:59 am
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • this is so sad. why do companies always try to make their logos contemporary, and instead just make them look dated? whatever happened to designing something that’s beautiful now and will continue to be so in 20 years?

  • Comment posted by mark on June 27, 2006 at 6:18 am
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • wow – that’s just bad…

  • Comment posted by mel on June 27, 2006 at 6:51 am
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • I like the BR alone, not with the word like DT said. But overall, the original is much better.

  • Comment posted by Mark on June 27, 2006 at 7:36 am
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • The logo doesn’t work (IMO) with the initials centered like that — as Evan noted above, it looks like it should read “Baskin Brrobins”.

    My only guess is that they tried to incorporate a more rounded font into the logo to identify with their new relationship with Dunkin Donuts — but as everyone else has noted here, it’s not working well.

    Considering BR has been around forever, and the previous logo is what people identify with, they should have left it alone. The better idea would have been to build a campaign around the time when BR was the place to go to — before Marble Slab and Cold Stone Creameries came along.

    With the new logo, I feel the nostalgia is gone and they look like the new, unproven kid.

  • Comment posted by db smith on June 27, 2006 at 7:38 am
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • I hate it.

    The first time I read it I was trying to figure out what “baskinB Robins” was. “baskinBRrobins” isn’t much better.

  • Comment posted by Jason Ayers on June 27, 2006 at 9:36 am
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • I dig it.

    They’ve managed to make their brand look newer than Cold Stone, whose logotype is very much like the old BR.

  • Comment posted by Andrew Smith on June 27, 2006 at 9:39 am
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • Interesting concept, but poorly done. The original logo is better.

  • Comment posted by Ben Wood on June 27, 2006 at 10:23 am
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • My first impression with the new one is “sChIzOpHrEnIc” and that the person who conceived this unreadable mess should be locked up.

  • Comment posted by Hornswaggled Again on June 27, 2006 at 11:09 am
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • Unfortunatly I agree i like the old one better. Maybe the days of eagerly going to BR have influenced me. I think the design is cool but too sharp for a corp logo, also a little hard on the eyes.

    I always think of FedEx and the arrow when i think of good logos. They had to create their own font to come up with that effect, i think.

  • Comment posted by Ben on June 27, 2006 at 1:31 pm
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • Man i hope someone didn’t actually get paid to come up with this. Imagine this thing in black and white…cuz they obviously didn’t. I’m trying to find something good about it… and cannot…
    I mean the original you can actually READ.

  • Comment posted by Thomas Chapin on June 27, 2006 at 4:33 pm
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • I bet this logo was sold to the client successfully because it was so “artistic”. The client was probably so excited by all the hidden meanings that they completely ignored the negative feedback they were getting from real people.

    Hidden meaning hints:

    B+R font convergence = 31 = 31 flavors = Yay!

    BRr = cold = ice cream = Yay!

  • Comment posted by Chris Tingom on June 28, 2006 at 10:32 am
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • I’m really amazed about everyones passion about this logo. It’s really the reason I posted it, because I hate the new one. I think the comment above from Mark summarizes exactly how I feel: “With the new logo, I feel the nostalgia is gone and they look like the new, unproven kid.”

  • Comment posted by Douglas Perkins on June 28, 2006 at 11:24 am
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • The FedEx logo is just Futura bold reworked, but very cleverly so. You’d be surprised how many designers go, “Oh, wow, there’s an arrow in there. I never noticed that before.”

  • Comment posted by luke on July 27, 2006 at 7:26 am
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • we flipped out yesterday when we passed a sign with the new logo. it has no flow whatsoever, none.

  • Comment posted by David Brenes on August 1, 2006 at 10:13 am
    Rating: not yet rated
      
  • My first impression when I see the new logo, I remember Roger Rabbit, I don’t know why, may be the letters, who knows. Why you change? The new logo look like a kinder garden ad.
    It’s not easy to read. Sorry but I don’t like it.

  • Comment posted by Molly on November 13, 2006 at 9:04 pm
    Rating: +0 votes
      
  • There was just something nostalgic about the old signs

  • Comment posted by Amy on February 12, 2007 at 3:35 pm
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • I think it wold look better if it was in this direction.

  • Comment posted by Ahab on May 2, 2007 at 8:24 am
    Rating: -2 votes
      
  • I love the concept…but the execution is pretty weak. THe font looks like it was put together by simply pulling some anchor points and the “BR” in the middle does not help it either.

    Love the concept though.

  • Comment posted by NIGGER on June 9, 2007 at 6:56 pm
    Rating: -1 votes
      
  • I AM A HUGE FAN OF THE NEW LOGO!!!! IN FACT, I’M CURRENTLY DEBATING A TATTOO! PEACE, LOVE, AND COOKIE DOUGH FOR LIFE!

  • Comment posted by manda on November 6, 2007 at 3:49 pm
    Rating: not yet rated
      
  • hate the new one! ew gross

  • Comment posted by dar on November 7, 2007 at 8:26 pm
    Rating: not yet rated
      
  • Why change for worse?

  • Comment posted by LookItUp4Reels on November 6, 2008 at 6:03 pm
    Rating: not yet rated
      
  • BR or 1312 is just the beginning folks! Think of what the numbers 1312 could be? A year maybe. 1312 A.D. Well, the biggest thing to happen in that year October 13 – Pope Clement V forcibly disbands the Knights Templar. Some argue[1] that this date is the basis for the stigma surrounding the “Friday the 13th”.

    Well, how about 1312 b.c., (Exodus) A 40-year Israelite migration begins after 3 centuries of Egyptian oppression. The prophet Moses and his brother Aaron lead tribesmen and their flocks of sheep out of Egypt toward the Dead Sea in Canaan on a roundabout journey that will take them through the Sinai Peninsula, Kadesh, Aelana, and Petra.

    The wandering Jews are sustained by “manna,” which falls daily from the heavens. Two portions fall on Friday, so that the Israelites will have food for the Sabbath as well.

Leave a comment